Our Constitution protects freedom. But how far does it go? What is in our “Right to Life”? What defines religious freedom?
The most recent challenge to this freedom is choosing not to participate in vaccinations. That ignited during the covid outbreak when many were faced with taking the vaccine or losing their job. After over twenty years working in a hospital, a good friend lost her nursing job. Our President has reinstated military personnel who chose not to take the shot and lost their jobs. Too late for many whose lives were sent into chaos, losing homes and savings while trying to support themselves and find other lines of work.
Is making the decision not to take a shot a religious one, or just personal preference? I personally think freedom should not be tied to an excuse. We are either free to choose how we live or not. Forcing chemical injections on anyone opposed to them is violating their freedom.
During our panicked “epidemic” of Covid, the government said it was our duty, for the sake of our neighbors, to immunize ourselves so we would not become a threat to others. At that time, A handful of doctors warned against the shots’ hazardous ingredients. Turns out they were right. When I went into the hospital with heart complications, the first 4 questions they asked in the emergency room were, Do you smoke? Do you drink? Have you taken any illicit drugs? And 4th, did you have the Covid vaccine?
Ties of pharmaceutical companies to the government go back decades. Lawmakers are cozy with those in Big Parma. Pharmaceutical companies have the most powerful lobbying group in the country. You cannot watch one segment of any TV program without seeing a drug commercial. They used to be prohibited from advertising on television. However, the laws changed in favor of drug companies.
Decades ago, I was told I was allergic to vaccines because the manufacturing process involved eggs, to which I am highly allergic. So, I always refused them. Later, I learned that these shots were derived from a line of fetal tissue from aborted babies. Here arrives the religious conscience objection. My religion defines abortion as murder.
So, to reject a vaccine on the grounds of its immorality (religious objection), do I need to prove I adhere to my religious faith? Which of the thousands of Christian faiths in this country would qualify? How far do we have to go to prove we are Christians? Do we become “card-carrying” Christians? Or will my checkbook stub with my weekly tithe do?
A recent news article from Life Site News came to my attention today about a family whose 5 children were taken away from them because a doctor reported to the Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS) that a 9-month-old baby was not given it is “required” vaccines. Can you imagine the trauma those children went through being taken from their mother? Thankfully, family members got word and stepped in to help take the children. But the parents are still facing legal fines. There may be more to this story than just the vaccines, but it was Massachusetts’ laws to report non-compliant vaccines, which sent this wrecking ball rolling.
It is absurd the amount of chemicals injected into little human bodies, who, if left to nature, build a host of natural immunities. These drugs are full of heavy metals and are toxic to the human body. A new parent naturally questions what is being pumped into her child. But “white coat syndrome” takes over common sense, and they listen to the “experts.” These vaccines used to be administered one or two at a time. Now multiples, at a frequent, recurring rate, are considered “required.”
Childhood vaccines have long been suspected in the sharp rise of Autism. HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy, Jr., has promised to investigate this. In another article by Life Site News, he is reported as saying that the Autism rate is now 1 in 31, compared to 1 in 10,000 fifty years ago. I have seen heartbreaking videos of babies, happy, normal, and interactive with their family, go into a zombie-like state just days after the vaccines.
A cousin of mine had two out of three boys with different degrees of Autism. One was functional and highly intelligent and went on to college. The other is not as fortunate. Both parents went through extensive testing, and it showed that the mother carried a gene that could be passed on to the child’s DNA to react to this brain malfunction. So, with that, they tried to rule out vaccines. I am not a medical expert, but another contributing factor is involved. A trigger. No one else in her family had ever had this issue.
Another mind-blowing news story I read was about a Catholic School rejecting a child’s application for not having the “required” shots. A Catholic school. The parents protested to the diocese on “RELIGIOUS” grounds, but their plea was rejected. Public schools require vaccines, which leads me to wonder: Does the choice not to vaccinate children have anything to do with the increase in homeschooling?
The new discrimination is towards the antivaxxers. Lawyers are lining up.
